IMGpapers 1968–75

Newspapers of the International Marxist Group and its forerunners, 1968–75

RIGHT TO WORK

Red Weekly No. 122, 23 October 1975 · p. 1 of the scan · 201 words

The scan: rw-no122-oct-23-1975.pdf (PDF, Marxists Internet Archive, opens at this page)

Uncorrected machine reading. This text was read by machine (Apple Vision OCR) from a scan of a newspaper page, and the page was cut into articles by machine, at the headlines found by their type size. Nothing has been corrected: expect misread words, text from a neighbouring article, and titles that are the machine reading of the headline, some of them only fragments. Quote from the scan, not from this page.
How this article was cut and titled: headline found by type size in the OCR geometry (split_tabloid.py); 4-4 of 4; machine-segmented newspaper page; uncorrected Vision OCR.

page 1 of the scan

4. The 'left' leaders of the trade unions and Labour Party must be forced to show where they stand. Scanlon, Benn and the Tribunites all claim to defend the right to They should denounce the TUC's sabotage. Benn should resign from the Government and lead a fight against Wilson's capitalist polieies if he claims to defend the right If these steps are taken, and the strike decision of the building workers extended, 26 November can be turned into the starting point and not the end of the campaign for jobs. The demonstration can issue a clear call for trade union Right to Work Committees in every area, local and regional strikes for jobs, and for full support of all workers engaged in struggle against redundancies. This must be part of the fight to organise a class struggle left wing in the labour movement which can smash the betrayals of the Wilson leadership.

With these steps 26 November can be the beginning of a massive fight to win the right to work. Red Weekly urges every single one of its supporters to move resolutions and take action to demonstrate, lobby and best of all strike for jobs on 26 November.

← SABOTAGINGFIGHT LABC MCAPP AND AFTER →

Something wrong on this page?